The Hardy Boys: The Mystery of Cabin Island (Hardy Boys Mystery Stories # 8 - Revised Text)

Okay, if the title to this book looks familiar, it should.  Just a couple of months ago, at the urging of some friends, I read the original version of this book, which was published nearly 100 years ago in 1929.  Approximately forty years after its initial publication, the Stratemeyer Syndicate, during the course of its revisions project, revised this particular book.  Andrew Svenson, best known for his own series, The Happy Hollisters, was given the task of writing the revised version of this title, reducing the story from 25 chapters down to 20 and the page count from 214 down to 178.   In some cases, the Syndicate merely cut out dialogue or certain scenes to reduce the length; however, in this instance, instead of simply shortening the story, Svenson gives readers what I would call a "re-imagining" of the story.

 

In both the original and the revised texts of The Mystery of Cabin Island,  Frank and Joe Hardy, along with their friends, Chet and Biff, investigate some mysterious goings-on at a cabin owned by Elroy Jefferson, a wealthy man whose automobile the boys had recovered when they solved a previous mystery involving car thieves. But, other than that basic premise, the remaining adventures are changed, sometimes in rather drastic ways.  The opening of the revised edition removes a rather large chunk of story from the original text, where the boys visit Cabin Island long before they get permission from Mr. Jefferson to stay there with their friends over the Christmas holidays.  In the revised, the first page reveals the boys have received permission to stay on the island as a "reward" for recovering the older man's car, and not only that, but Mr. Jefferson also has a mystery he wishes the boys to solve.  Thus, while the original had a somewhat slow build-up, the revised jumps right into the heart of the story, letting readers know from the very first page that Frank and Joe were going to be solving a mystery at Cabin Island!

 

Chapter after chapter, page after page, more and more of the story is changed in ways that seem to emphasize action more than anything else.  In the original, the boys did not face a run-in with another ice boat until the end of the second chapter; however, in this version, the ice boat handled by Tad Carson and Ike Nash runs them down in the first chapter (with a nice, two-page spread line illustration that seems to be a redux of the frontis piece from the original text).  And for those who remember the second ice boat incident in the original, where poor Chet could not gain control of his boat, it might surprise you to discover that in this revised version, it is the vile Mr. Hanleigh and Tad Carson who purposely attack the Hardys' boat, knocking them out onto the ice along with old Mr. Jefferson!  Poor Mr. Jefferson is injured, and the Hardys end up taking him back to the cabin, where he spends the night - a scene that never took place in the original.

 

There are quite a few other differences that deviate from the original tale.  One major difference is the fact that Mr. Jefferson has a grandson in this revised text, who disappeared and is the center of the mystery that Mr. Jefferson asks the boys to solve.  And in the original story, the boys learn about Mr. Jefferson's stolen stamps from the general store owner, Amos Grice, while in this version, Mr. Jefferson himself relates the story of the stolen medals to Frank and Joe - and yes, that's another revision. Perhaps by the late 1960s, stolen stamps would not seem as valuable to stolen medals, so the Syndicate changed the object of the theft - which creates another big change, as a "ghost" that is scene on the island (mostly by Chet) turns out to be the representative of the great Shah Ali, who has come to seek out Mr. Jefferson in the hopes of buying back one of the medals in his possession (or, rather, in his former possession, since the medals are missing).

 

One incident in the original text that I am actually glad they removed was the fox hunting chapter, where the boys hunt down and kill some foxes that Mr. Grice believes stole some of his chickens.  In the original, the Hardys use the rifles given them as Christmas presents by their parents; in the revised, the boys receive much needed snowshoes instead and there is no mention of stolen chickens or fox hunting.  And speaking of Christmas, that is yet one more revision in the text - in the original story, the boys spend Christmas day together in the cabin; in the revised tale, the boys spend Christmas morning with their families, and they do not head out to Cabin Island until after Christmas.  And the climactic scene where the tree comes crashing down on the cabin in the original?  Nope, it is removed from the revised, and the boys instead merely face a fierce snow storm that breaks through the windows, sending snow and cold into the cabin.

 

There is one difference that I found made the story a bit more challenging for the boys, and that involves the cryptogram.  In the original, the code to solve the cryptic message was simply reversing the alphabet:  to wit, A = Z, B = Y, C = X, and so on.  In this revised version, however, Svenson gives Frank and Joe (and the reader) and much more challenging solution, as the code actually makes use of the thief's name - John Paul Sparewell, Houseman (i.e., A = J, B = O, C = H, D = N, and so on).  I found that to be a much more creative solution, which would explain why the boys had such difficulty in solving the puzzle.  In the original, the solution proved way too easy and basically made the Hardys look inept, in that they could not have deciphered such a simple code.

 

Something I found both books to have in common is the illustrations of the ice boats.  In the original text, the plain frontis piece (by artist Ausott) shows Frank, Joe, and Chet in their iceboat, which has very little room for anything other than the three of them.  In the revised text, the frontis piece, as well as the two-page spread on pages 8 and 9 show ice boats with barely room for the riders - the frontis has only Frank and Joe with room for no one or nothing else; and the two page spread shows all four boys in the boat (and it is supposed to be the same boat, so how did they manage that?) with no extra room.  So this begs the question - how did these four boys fit into the ice boat, along with all of their gear, clothes, and the boxes of food that Chet brought, when those illustrations make the boat appear to have very little free space, if any at all?!  Artistic license, I suppose...

 

While I cannot say that either of the Cabin Island texts were overly enjoyable (remember, I am not much of a Hardy Boys fan to begin with), I can say that the original text offers up a richer tale with stronger characterization.  The revised text seems to focus more on fast-paced action, with constant accidents, danger, scares, and such, relying on the action to move the story rather than the mystery itself.  I think I prefer Svenson's Happy Hollisters' series far more than I did this Hardy Boys tale.

 

RATING:  5 handsome, gleaming medals out of 10 for the attempt at re-imagining a 1920s mystery for the 1960s (leaving one to wonder what a re-imagining of this tale for the 2000s would look like?)

The Hardy Boys: The Mystery of Cabin Island (Hardy Boys Mystery Stories # 8 - Original Text)

Yes, believe it or not, I can now say I have actually read a vintage Hardy Boys book.  Growing up, I did not like the Hardy Boys, because to me, they were more adventure stories than they were mystery stories.  I was more interested in haunted houses, spooky staircases, dark attics, hidden rooms, and the like.  These were the type of mysteries I could find in the Nancy Drew books.  In recent years, yes, I've been reading the recently published Hardy Boys Adventures series, and they have not been half-bad.  Yet, I just have not been able to bring myself to go back and read those original adventures of Frank and Joe Hardy, as I simply did not have the interest.  But with the Christmas holidays, I have been urged (I would say "bullied," but in today's climate, people would jump on that and take it completely the wrong way!) to read one particular Hardy Boys book that is set during that time, and I had no other choice ... so I did!

The Mystery of Cabin Island is the eighth book in the Hardy Boys series, published back in 1929 (the year before Nancy Drew made her debut).  It was written by Leslie McFarlane based on an outline provided by Edward Stratemeyer, and it could have been more aptly subtitled, "The Hardy Boys and their Ice Boat Adventures."  The boys spend an inordinate amount of time in this book traveling in their ice boats, nearly getting run down twice by other ice boats (one from some rivals, one from their friends), and it seems the ice boats are their only means of travel between "Cabin Island" and the mainland of Bayport.  The frontis piece of the edition I have of this book is even an illustration (by someone named "Auscott") of their rivals' ice boat "booming down on the smaller craft at terrific speed" (p. 16).  It is interesting to note that this scene takes place so early in the book - normally the frontis piece of series books depicts a scene from much later in the story.  I also have to wonder at McFarlane's choice of words, since just a few paragraphs before on the previous page, he describes the boat as "hurtling forward at terrific speed" (p. 15), then reiterates the same phrase when ending the chapter with "booming down ... at terrific speed" (p. 16).  Perhaps he forgot his thesaurus when he was writing that day (sorry Pam!).

 

The story centers around the isolated cabin that stands on Cabin Island, owned by one Elroy Jefferson.  The boys visit the island with their friend Chet Morton, only to be warned away by a man they later learn is Mr. Hanleigh - a rather pushy man intent on buying the island from Mr. Jefferson.  The boys befriend Mr. Jefferson, who it turns out was one of the people that they helped save his valuable car in a previous book (The Shore Road Mystery), and he graciously allows the boys and their friends to camp out at the cabin over the Christmas break from school.  Something odd about the planning of his trip is that Chet first mentions the idea of camping out over the Christmas holidays at the beginning of the story (p 3); yet, a few chapters later, Biff Hooper makes the suggestion of a camping trip over the holidays, and the Hardys say they will think about it and discuss it with Chet (pp. 30-31) - why would they need to discuss something with Chet who already approached them with the idea?  Had they already forgotten Chet's suggestion?  Or had McFarlane forgotten already that he wrote that earlier scene?

The mystery, such as it is, comes into play after Frank, Joe, Chet and Biff take up residence in the cabin and all of their food supply is stolen!  They do eventually locate the food hidden behind some rocks on the shore beneath the cabin, along with a small notebook that contains a message written in code.  Personally, I found the code rather simple to crack, but the boys spend a number of chapters trying to figure it out (I suppose if they solved it too early, it would not make for an exciting story).  It is obvious the notebook belonged to Mr. Hanleigh, who keeps returning to the island, looking for something in the cabin.  The cover even depicts one of those instances when the boys spy the man sneaking into the cabin (pp. 113-14).  It ultimately turns out that a valuable stamp collection stolen from Mr. Jefferson many years ago was hidden in the cabin by the thief, and Mr. Hanleigh is determined to get his hands on it.  As the coded message reveals, the box containing the stamps is located somewhere near or in the chimney (which seems to be a common thing in children's series books - check out The Wooden Shoe Mystery and The Missing Formula to see what I mean).  McFarlane does provide a rather dramatic climax to the story, when a tree collapses on the cabin during a horrific snow storm, destroying the chimney and revealing the hidden location of the box (pp. 195-99).

While the mystery itself was not overly thrilling and seemed to be a smaller portion of the story, I do have to say the book contains quite a few dated references in it (and considering it was published in 1929, one would have to expect it to!).  The most obvious one was when the Hardys discover the notebook, and Frank find written on one of the pages "October, 1917") - to which he exclaims, "Why, that's eleven years ago" (p. 101).  This is the first actual date reference I've seen in any of these series books, where a character specifically sets the date (since that eleven years would place the story in 1928, the year prior to the publication date).  It was my understanding that the Syndicate specifically avoided these type of references, so as to not fully date the books; but, perhaps, since this was still while Edward Stratemeyer was in charge, he was not as stringent about these type of things as his daughters became.  There is also the reference to Frank and Joe receiving "two small caliber rifles, each with a box of ammunition" for Christmas presents from their father (p. 46).  You would DEFINITELY not see rifles given to teenagers as gifts in today's books, that's for sure!

There's also the overuse of the word "queer" in the book (which, back in the time when this book was written, would have meant "strange" or "odd" - it did not have the same connotation that it does today).  In just a few paragraphs, one of the characters refers to Elroy Jefferson as "very queer" and "a queer old chap," even saying he had "a heart of gold, specially where boys is concerned.  But queer - mighty queer in some ways..." (p. 86).  People reading those lines today would probably have an entirely different take on what was meant!  And speaking of word use, McFarlane used a rather interesting term to describe poor Biff - he was described as "pugilistically inclined" (p. 79), which refers to someone fighting with his fists, specifically used when talking about boxers.  I have to wonder how many young people would have known what that word meant - heck, I did not even know what it meant until I looked it up!  Then there's the reference to the two foxes killed by Frank and Biff in the story - McFarlane writes that "the boys cut the brushes from the two foxes ... and placed the prizes in a place of honor above the fireplace" (p. 132).  I honestly cannot figure out exactly what the author is referring to here.  I was unable to find a definition for the phrase "cut the brushes" in this context (most of what I found referred to cutting paint brushes); speaking with my friend Pam, who is a McFarlane expert, it seems "cut the brushes" refers to the fact that the boys cut off the fox tails and kept them as trophies of their catch.  I had never heard this before, so perhaps it is a Canadian turn of phrase.

McFarlane also makes reference in the story to Edgar Allen Poe's short story, "The Gold-Bug" (p. 105).  That particular story involves the deciphering of a secret message (written as a cryptogram) that is supposed to lead the characters to a buried treasure. He clearly used this as a comparison to the Hardys attempting to figure out the cryptogram written in the notebook they discovered.  Frank even tries to follow the character's suggestion in the story of looking for the most frequently appearing letter in the message and substituting it with the letter "e," which is said to be the most frequently used letter in the English language (p. 105) - sadly, though, that substitution method did not work for the Hardys.  At least McFarlane did not make it too easy on them (although, in reality, the solution to the code is fairly simple - reversing the alphabet, i.e. A=Z, B=Y, C=X, and so on).

The only other thing I thought was note-worthy was the fact that Chapter XX in the book has an entire change in the point of view.  That particular chapter is told completely through the eyes of Mr. Hanleigh, as he faces difficulties with his henchmen, Carson and Nash, who have been ferrying him back and forth to Cabin Island aboard their own ice boat.  It is rather fun to read part of the story from the villain's point of view, as you see how easily he gets riled up and how he intends to double-cross his own men!

While I understand that a number of Hardy Boys fans like this particular volume, I have to admit that I did not find it all that great.  Sure, it has plenty of adventure in it, but I like mystery, and the book fell rather short on that (in my opinion).  I tried to go into it with an open mind, and not let my distaste for the Hardy Boys series to color my reading of the story; but, I suppose, I'm just not a Hardy Boys fan, and for me, this story is a reminder why I prefer Nancy Drew and the other female sleuths to boys' series such as this.

RATING:  6 precious rosewood boxes out of 10 for giving me a cryptogram to solve (I love those type of puzzles!) and showing how dangerous ice boating can be!

The Mystery of the Mysteriously Missing Brother (The Hearty Bros # 1) - a Hardy Boys parody

I'm always up for a good parody, especially when it pokes fun of everyone's favorite teen detectives, Nancy Drew and/or the Hardy Boys!  In this latest find, Frank and Joe Hardy - oops!  I mean, Frank and Joe HEARTY (after all, in order to constitute a parody, the names have to be changed!) are all grown up, and Frank's two sons are now set to carry on the family tradition.  But these are the Hardys ... er, I mean the Heartys ... that you may remember from your youth!  Joe is troubled, Frank is a has-been detective trying to follow in his father's footsteps, Callie is now Frank's wife and nothing like that spirited young girl of her youth, and Frank and Callie's two sons - Fenton II and James - are nothing, and I mean NOTHING, like their father and uncle!  Well, they may have more in common with their uncle...

The Mystery of the Mysteriously Missing Brother opens with Frank Hearty starting a search for his brother, Joe, who has been incommunicado for way too long.  Frank is used to Joe dropping off the grid for a while - usually when he is hiding out from the police or people he has swindled or dealers to whom he owes money - but this time, his silence has lasted way too long.  Frank is beginning to worry.  Sheriff Colic is none to eager to help, because with Joe gone, that's less crime he has to deal with.  His wife is too large and too lazy to be concerned with her brother-in-law's whereabouts.  And his sons?  Well, they are either too high or too wrapped up in their own lives to be bothered.  So it falls upon Frank to begin the search for his mysteriously missing brother, even if that means going undercover in the absolute worst part of Bayporch to find him!

But don't count Fenton II and James out of the picture.  They may seem unconcerned, but in reality, they are just as determined to find Scoops (their affectionate name for their Uncle Joe).  But they have their own ways of searching for clues - so after smoking a few bowls, Fenton II manages to remember a few details from the last time he hung out with his uncle, and so beings the Hearty Bros. search for their mysteriously missing uncle.

The book definitely takes the Hardys ... er, the Heartys ... down a dark and twisted path.  The criminal element of Bayporch is considerably worse than that of Bayport, and the amount of drugs and other crimes going on in Frank's own family is something the Stratemeyer Syndicate would have never ever allowed in their series!  But there are some humorous elements to the story and the characters, and the obliviousness of Frank to the things his family is involved with (Fenton II's "herbal" garden, Callie's special brownies, etc.) gives him a slight air of innocence in a dark underworld type of tale.  There are pointed references to the actual books, with the house on the cliff, Shore Road, the secret of the caves, the hidden harbor, and others, so fans of the Hardy Boys will enjoy those Easter eggs.  And while the author did not fill the book with explicit sex (as many authors of parodies seem wont to to do), there is a considerable amount of vulgarities, including the "f---" word, that many times feels forced for no particular reason.

I will say there is one supporting character introduced into the story that, when he is killed off near the end of the book, I was rather disappointed.  I hadn't even realized how much I liked the character until the climactic battle in the drug dealer's sanctuary that resulted in this death.  I won't spoil it by telling you who the character is, but let's just say that no one is very safe in this book.  

Now, about that cover art ... I am surprised that they can get away with using the actual cover art from The Flickering Torch Mystery by Rudy Nappi.  Sure, someone took a marker and drew things all over the art, but it's still without a doubt the same art that Nappi painted for the revised 22nd volume of the Hardy Boys Mystery Stories.  Perhaps they can claim it is a "parody" of the original cover by the addition of the sharpee-drawn bong, smoke, and God-knows what else on the cover.

And, although this is touted as book 1 in a series,and there is a reference to the Hearty Bros' next mystery at the end of the final chapter ("They didn't know it yet, but they would in The Case of the Muff Diver's Muff Cave), there does not appear to be any second book in the series, at least not on Amazon or anywhere else that I can find.  Which is not necessarily a bad thing, since, although I did get a chuckle or two out of this book, I don't know if I could sit through another one.

RATING:  5 fresh glasses of water with lemon wedges out of 10 for giving fans a parody that is NOT focused solely on sexual situations.

The Hardly Boys and The Mystery of the Golden Goblet - a Hardy Boys parody

While I'm not exactly the biggest Hardy Boys fan, I am always a fan of a good parody. Ever since the Airplane! films and the later Scary Movie films, I have loved the art of parody. So far, Mabel Maney probably has the best parodies when it comes to Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys - but there have been a few others than have made me chuckle here and there. So, when I saw this particular book on Amazon and read the premise - the Hardly brothers are "cryogeriatrically" placed in a state of suspended animation for 50 years, and these boys of the '50s wake up in the bodies of old men in the 2000s - well, it sounded like a great fish-out-of-water kind of fun.

Instead of fun, though, the story turned out to be pretty painful...

The Mystery of the Golden Goblet pretty much reads like a normal Hardy Boys adventure story.The mystery involves a valuable golden goblet that is encrusted with valuable jewels that is stolen from a local museum, and it is up to the boys to find it. The only problem is, it is an international smuggling organization that may have stolen it, so the FBI are involved - lucky for the boys, their father is on good terms with the FBI, so the boys and their friends are asked to help find and capture the crooks.  There are lots of moments of adventure along the way - an undersea cavern, a submarine chase, secret rooms in an abandoned mansion, shoot-outs in the sky, deadly boat chases, disguises, car chases, and the like.  I suppose for Hardy Boys fans, this book might be downright enjoyable.  But for me, my question the entire time was - where is the parody?

Sure, the boys are now in the bodies of 70-something year old men; yet, they act and move just like teenagers, so apparently those aged bodies don't affect them at all. Their parents and aunt are all still alive and in their nineties. Their girlfriends are still alive and in their 70s, having waited all those years as single women, waiting for the Hardly Boys to return. They don't know what cell phones are, they don't understand all of the modern cultural references, they still use slang terms from the 1950s, and they are both timid and unsure of themselves when it comes to being around girls (women). Sure, the author tries to play the "fish-out-of-water" aspect by having the boys refer to themselves as teenagers while the world around them sees them as 70-year-old men, but those scenes often fall flat. In fact, there is very little humor at all in the book. I mean, based on the premise, I had figured on reading scenes where the boys are unable to do a lot because of their aging bodies; I had though there would be jokes about their need to wear Depends undergarments, or the creaking they hear is the bones and not a door opening, etc. Yet, not once are there any jabs about the boys' age.

Then I read a bit about the author, Tom Cherones. Seems Mr. Cherones was an "Emmy Award Winning director of the Seinfield TV series," and that pretty much said it all for me. I was never a fan of Seinfield. I saw an episode here and there, but never once found them to be funny. So, I guess it should come as no surprise then that I don't find his writing of the Hardy Boys to be funny. Which is  shame, because I really tried to find some enjoyment in it.

The one surprise I did rather like, though, was the single internal illustration at the beginning of the book. The art was done by none other than husband and wife team, Terry & Rachel Dodson, who are very well-known and established comic book artists, having done some magnificent work on Wonder Woman, and who are currently providing art on Image Comics' Adventureman. I certainly never expected to see comic book artists of this caliber providing internal (and cover) art for a little independent book such as this. I guess that was the one saving grace for this book and made it (somewhat) worth buying.

Would I recommend this book? Most likely not. If you are a huge Hardy Boys fan and want anything and everything that is related to the brothers, then perhaps you might get this just to have a complete collection. Otherwise, for me, the story is not worth reading.

RATING:  3 swipes of a credit card out of 10 for at least attempting to give Hardy Boys fans a parody of the crime-solving brothers.